WHEN I WAS GETTING THIS POST TOGETHER AND READING ALL WISDOM THAT WHITE FOLK HAD, IT DAWNED ON ME. THE REAL QUESTION THEY NEED TO BE ASKING IS NOT ABOUT THE COST OF ADOPTING ANY BABIES OR WHY YOU HAVE TO PAY TO ADOPT A BABY. THE REAL QUESTION FROM MY STANDPOINT IS WHY DO YOU HAVE TO ADOPT A BABY IN THE FIRST?
THIS FROM AMREN:
Seriously though, this “The fees typically cover administrative costs, but also costs associated with taking care of the mother, like travel, rent, health care and counseling services. ” makes it sound like they are selling babies, especially when they being priced like they are automobiles. Why is a mulatto more than a pet? To me, they are the same.
Whatever happened to “adoption”? Why are there so few orphanages?
Funruffian: I am literally shocked that any non-Black would pay money to adopt a Black orphan. I thought that it was either free of charge, or that you could get compensation for doing so.
reply borogirl54: I would think that this would be the case for Black boys, who are harder to place than black girls. From what I understand the easiest child to place is a light skinned black girl with straight hair.
reply The__Bobster: Not one of these?
Anon: You have no idea what happens when taxpayer dollars are involved.
If you want to see something unbelievable, do a search for “HIV-positive adoption”.
There are evil whites who will adopt HIV-positive orphans from Africa and bring these diseased trash here. Why oh why would they do this? First, they get lots of applause from their peers, so whatever moral failures they have, they feel great about themselves. And it doesn’t cost them anything because guess what, all these taxpayer-funded services start flowing to HIV-positive children. It’s so great to get a moral high and have someone else pay for it and suffer the lifelong costs and consequences of HIV-positive Africans being brought to the US. Each one of these precious babies is a burden of millions and millions of dollars on US taxpayers, and if they are boys they will soon enough start spreading it to white girls, destroying their futures.
Nathanwartooth: This couple should have really looked at studies showing that Black children raised in a White home will still have the IQ of their birth parents.
For the rest of their lives they will be blaming other Whites for their adopted children’s problems.
When they fail in school or get in legal trouble, it will never be their fault.
Eddie Lutz: The black orphans are way over-priced.
reply jimjunior: They couldn’t pay me 18,000 to even think of it.
reply r j p: I would for 18K ….. in Chicago you can take an unwanted baby to a firehouse and a few other places and drop it off, no questions asked. I would be trying for one a week.
thurlow: Maybe they should try buy one get one free.
Cactus Jack: do they have a return policy when they turn out to be nothing but thugs, it is in their genes…
reply The__Bobster: Yeah, you bought it, you own it.
D.B. Cooper: The cost to adopt the Caucasian child was approximately $35,000, plus some legal expenses.
If an expectant mom walks into the adoption agency’s office, and she looks like the lovely Dianna Agron (add an extra $20,000), and her ex boyfriend is a recent Air Force Academy graduate (add another $20,000) who looks like Captain America (add yet another $20,000); and I’ll bet the remaining $5,000 that the agent will have to excuse herself for a minute to wipe the drool from her mouth. While the agent is in the restroom, she will have to put in Visine to get rid of the dollar signs floating in her eyes.
reply eduard: The world has gone sicko, not to mention the overpopulation of the darkies. Wonder what Neil Patrick Harris paid for his babies. How morally sick can you get when you have all the bucks. As the saying goes: Money corrupts.
Anon: Same thing with eggs. I assume the value of black donor eggs is zero. Blond women with advanced degrees can charge $100,000 for an egg, in comparison. Black donor sperm, unless it’s from a top athlete, is probably also worth zero. Of course taxpayers will pay a million dollars for a black sperm donation or egg, in the form of raising the guy’s children, but the free market pays zero for those things.
Is anyone questioning why Rachel Jeantel can’t sell her eggs for the price of a coffee, while a highly educated white woman can sell hers for $100,000 or more? You would think that liberals would buy the cheapest eggs available, because the genetics make no difference, and the egg is going to be in a perfect environment from conception onward. Rachel Jeantel’s eggs should have the same market value and future hopes as the eggs of, say, Natalie Portman (went to Harvard) because the only thing that matters is the environment.
IstvanIN: Black babies are like black Barbies, they always end up in the discount bin.
JDInSanDiego: It works the same in animal shelters. I went into a local one once and 21 of the 25 dogs were pit bulls or a few pit bull mixes. No one wanted them
Howard W. Campbell: When my brother and his wife started the adoption process, the social workers were practically begging him to take little Dontavious off their hands. The state would even help out with most of the costs. If you would assume the care and feeding of a “Dontavious”, a (minority) cripple, or a crack baby, money could be found to help with the adoption expenses.
I would rather pay the 35k up front and avoid all of the issues that blacks will have when they hit the teenage years. While I am not a big fan of it, I can understand why parents will adopt Chinese girls. Sometimes, it takes an act of God to adopt a healthy white child, and if you are too “old” forget it. All of these celebrities who are adopting racially correct children are going to be in for a rude awakening in 10 -15 years.
Fortunately, they eventually adopted a white child from overseas.
Unperson: White child: $35,000. The bargain of the century.
Black child: $18,000. The rip-off of the century.
YOU MAY WANT TO GO AND READ SOME OF THESE GEMS YOURSELF……..NO!!